# Cochin, Cochin, soup slurped ... though not for the market to be answered ...

Александр Ольбик

A letter to friends, discussing the role of samoobolschentsev in the mayoral election in Moscow ...


The guys (Victor and Jura), you like a die-hard liberals deny me, a poor harried life circumstances dude expressing his private opinion of the provincial? This is how could this have happened? Victor chides me for what I pay tribute to whom "laudatory odes," and accuses me Jura in the persecution of Nabal, from which it appears that I blame all around. And you, my dear friends and comrades, in a sense, too, the iron roller comes over to me, and even kill, but with such collisions I strongly disagree. And who is closer and more expensive - the future mayor Sobyanin and samonaznachenets Nawal, who like mad without any reason rushing into politics? I'm next to you, and these "trump card" for a thousand miles. from you ... It is not good, not collectively and even somehow nasupleno unfriendly. You, Victor, in his pedaliruesh the comments on some of the shortcomings in the policy and, more generally, in the life of Russia, to which you can not argue. There is indeed a lot of this, with what and thus a giant scraper in one night is not council. But it's not a secret, it's obvious, like the fact that Russia is not well, not all liberals and separatists clipped her hamstring healed, that not all the festering wounds safely dry out, which is not a secret, but does it follow that the wounded Russia must be taken by the throat and slight pressure on the carotid artery choke? She needs help rehabilitate ... or you, my friends, to such an outcome? And Russian nothing to you, a stranger side that Die - will not spare? Then I was even more sorry Russia, and you will also regret ... And what I mean by the word be rehabilitated? Well, first of all, to stop, finally, it is infinitely klepzdonit and throw mud, secondly, do not make a "contribution" to discredit her powers to eliminate them, replaced by other (as it was in the same Egypt , and Libya. that are now trying to repeat in Syria), in which the ideological vector is not looking to the future, is reversed. Jura, well, what was given to you this Nabal? What did he Telegram? Charming dimple on his chin? So this piece rather suggest the duality of his personality, rather than on any personal benefits ... This man, for the honor and dignity of which you are ready to his fellow SA strictly rein, just samoobolschenets and compared with Sobyanin complete jerk, like one of the recruits of the Leninist-Stalinist guard ... That very 100000th guard from the machine, which is then sent to the management of the entire national economy of post-revolutionary Russia. That is, instead of professional managers began to put the half-drunk or sober dropouts board, believing that their loyalty will help to overcome all the blame on the head of Russian problems. And that, say, only the dictatorship of the proletariat will save Russia and will make everyone happy. And in our time, the liberal dictatorship took over the role of saving, although the dictatorship of the proletariat and its leaders, it is not much different. For her, that flood hundred barges with white officers, prisoners of war, that ssuchit people with power and on this warm their pampered little hands doing nothing - the same thing. So, Nawal compared with Sobyanin, who was a giant proficiency to manage all sorts of useful national economic processes, who is savage, primitive accountant who learned how to count money in someone else's pocket and gradually got the hang of some purely verbal way to make millions. That is chatter. Yes, he has a degree, but in this formation (twice walked the halls of Harvard) in Russia will not get far. And when I call him a jerk, then invest in this gentleman's word is this consideration - its zero ability to control a powerful national economic complex that is Moscow, where he is chervyachi creeps. He is also a moron because they do not realize that there where he wants to crawl, some slogans will not get off, there may feast on Bolotnaya not solve a damn thing. I already wrote, even "competent" to steal it failed (kirovles), although in this case had the highest degree of personal interest. But if he could not properly take, then, who can guarantee that this subchik can competently give something? But that's not important ... My friends, despite your selfless rumbling in my address, I still again will turn your attention to this important for policy-leader thing as his authority. How goes Sobyanin? Gradually, with great dignity, because behind him an enormous amount of practical and extremely useful for Muscovites cases and therefore the whole look of it speaks of great confidence and self-sufficiency. How goes Nawal? All times trot trot on marshy, trotting in the "funnel", trotted out his camera and back. One bustle. And what does he say? He does not say it copies of Adolf, and that's what he says, we'll leave it out of the equation sanity. But, whatever may be said, always lying and someone inserts a butt of public violence. That is, issues its wish for no less than its real. A kind of mix of Baron Munchausen, Zhirinovsky and Shikelgrubera ... Well, what authority can have an incredible mayor Navalny with this compote? Smehotura! People will look at his face, at his charming dimple, and obsessive thoughts will see all three of the above way ... It should Moscow and Muscovites? Yes, God forbid mja of vicious dogs and angry spouses, and even more so save us from tipchik ala Nabal Alyosha. If he were alive and well ...

Now the political merits of Nabal. Yura, you're not lazy and read "The presentation of the 2nd round of the debate," ... Well done, now do not be lazy again and read his speeches at rallies, where he cast off the veil of "honesty" (which is a desirable feature of any policy), carried a watering against the president, deputies, and all branches of government, that is reassuring my friend, who visited at the rally, a wandering dog shame for liberals instantly skapustilsya. Dirt, lies, innuendo, insults, blatant slander uttered publicly and without evidence - it's your - what? The normal course? No, my friend, is a dictatorship of liberalism, part of which is slander, lies, with all that it implies ... remind me if I forget, or Sobyanin, Putin once was called Nabal, a goat, a scumbag, a prostitute? Never! Here's another difference between these politicians and impostors samoobolschentsami-type ala Nawal. Freedom of speech - it's good, but freedom of speech Nabal - it is abomination. It is a pity that canceled the duel, and if they were still in use, it has long been a beautiful corpse Nabal with a charming dimple on his chin would limply Parnassus reincarnated into a mummy-type wax from the salon of Madame Tussauds. If, of course, he won in the eyes of its political partners of such a high honor ... But I do not think he is the "beloved leader" even for just two liberals - the same Nemtsov with Ryzhkov ... I can not imagine an intelligent soft Sobyanin with gun hands, aimed at accuser Nabal, but very easy to picture my imagination is like a steady hand Putin clutched in his hand, "Grach", rises to the level of the eyes vis Nabal for a moment transfixed, and then a couple of inches to the side and shifted - shot rang out ... A shot rang out, but Nabal is healthy and perky just faints, while a little wet myself ... And ... And Putin Putin, throwing the phrase "whether or not this shit contact," leaving the field failed to match its classic form ... premonition What are you, Jura, once again accuse me of my prejudice against the applicant for the Moscow mayor's seat ... I must confess that there is such a thing, and this is explained quite simply: I do not know by hearsay about these "eagles" who are ready for the power to sell his own mother, not to mention the whole country, and therefore, believe my experience (much larger than yours) that these "eagles" should advance to denounce and deny them the title of "eagle" and call the true definition - necrophages ... But all I here you plainly stated, is reduced to the words of the great Kant (I hope Jura and Victor, this guy you will not have any claims), said: "... there is no right to indignation, even less - to revolt and to a lesser extent - the right to encroach on his person as a single entity (monarch) and his life under the pretext that he was abusing his power. slightest attempt in this direction is treason, and such a traitor can only be punished by death as for trying to destroy their country ... "